The Diamond Sutra
(translated by A.F.Price and Wong Mou-Lam)
Section I. The Convocation of the Assembly
Thus have I heard. Upon a time Buddha sojourned in
Anathapindika's Park by Shravasti with a great company of
bhikshus, even twelve hundred and fifty. One day, at the time
for breaking fast, the World-honoured One enrobed, and
carrying His bowl made His way into the great city of
Shravasti to beg for His food. In
the midst of the city He
begged from door to door according to rule. This done, He
returned to His retreat and took His meal. When He had
finished He put away His robe and begging bowl, washed His
feet, arranged His seat, and sat down.
Section
II. Subhuti Makes a Request
Now in the midst of the
assembly was the Venerable Subhuti. Forthwith he arose,
uncovered his right shoulder, knelt upon his right knee, and,
respectfully raising his hands with palms joined, addressed
Buddha thus: World-honoured One, if good men and good women
seek the Consummation of Incomparable Enlightenment, by what
criteria should they abide and how should they control their
thoughts?
Buddha said: Very good, Subhuti! Just as you
say, the Tathagata is ever-mindful of all the Bodhisattvas,
protecting and instructing them well. Now listen and take my
words to heart: I will declare to you by what criteria good
men and good women seeking the Consummation of Incomparable
Enlightenment should abide, and how they should control their
thoughts.
Said Subhuti: Pray, do, World-honoured One. With
joyful anticipation we long to hear.
Section
III. The Real Teaching of the Great Way
Buddha said:
Subhuti, all the Bodhisattva-Heroes should discipline their
thoughts as follows: All living creatures of whatever class,
born from eggs, from wombs, from moisture, or by
transformation whether with form or without form, whether in a
state of thinking or exempt from thought-necessity, or wholly
beyond all thought realms -- all these are caused by Me to
attain Unbounded Liberation Nirvana. Yet when vast,
uncountable, immeasurable numbers of beings have thus been
liberated, verily no being has been liberated. Why is this,
Subhuti? It is because no Bodhisattva who is a real
Bodhisattva cherishes the idea of an ego-entity, a
personality, a being, or a separated individuality.
Section IV. Even the Most Beneficent Practices are
Relative
Furthermore, Subhuti, in the practice of charity
a Bodhisattva should be detached. That is to say, he should
practice charity without regard to appearances; without regard
to sound, odour, touch, flavour or any quality.
Subhuti,
thus should the Bodhisattva practice charity without
attachment. Wherefore? In such a case his merit is
incalculable. Subhuti, what do you think?
Can you measure
all the space extending eastward?
No, World-honoured One,
I cannot.
Then can you, Subhuti, measure all the space
extending southward, westward, northward, or in any other
direction, including nadir and zenith?
No, World-honoured
One, I cannot.
Well, Subhuti, equally incalculable is the
merit of the Bodhisattva who practices charity without any
attachment to appearances. Subhuti, Bodhisattvas should
persevere one-pointedly in this instruction.
Section V. Understanding the Ultimate Principle of Reality
Subhuti, what do you think? Is the Tathagata to be
recognised by some material characteristic?
No,
World-honoured One; the Tathagata cannot be recognised by any
material characteristic. Wherefore? Because the Tathagata has
said that material characteristics are not, in fact, material
characteristics.
Buddha said: Subhuti, wheresoever are
material characteristics there is delusion; but whoso
perceives that all characteristics are in fact
no-characteristics, perceives the Tathagata.
Section VI. Rare is True Faith
Subhuti said to Buddha:
World-honoured One, will there always be men who will truly
believe after coming to hear these teachings?
Buddha
answered: Subhuti, do not utter such words! At the end of the
last five-hundred-year period following the passing of the
Tathagata, there will be self-controlled men, rooted in merit,
coming to hear these teachings, who will be inspired with
belief. But you should realise that such men have not
strengthened their root of merit under just one Buddha, or two
Buddhas, or three, or four, or five Buddhas, but under
countless Buddhas; and their merit is of every kind. Such men,
coming to hear these teachings, will have an immediate
uprising of pure faith, Subhuti; and the Tathagata will
recognise them. Yes, He will clearly perceive all these of
pure heart, and the magnitude of their moral excellences.
Wherefore? It is because such men will not fall back to
cherishing the idea of an ego-entity, a personality, a being,
or a separated individuality. They will neither fall back to
cherishing the idea of things as having intrinsic qualities,
nor even of things as devoid of intrinsic qualities.
Wherefore? Because if such men allowed their minds to
grasp and hold on to anything they would be cherishing the
idea of an ego-entity, a personality, a being, or a separated
individuality; and if they grasped and held on to the notion
of things as having intrinsic qualities they would be
cherishing the idea of an ego-entity, a personality, a being,
or a separated individuality.
Likewise, if they grasped
and held on to the notion of things as devoid of intrinsic
qualities they would be cherishing the idea of an ego-entity,
a personality, a being, or a separated individuality. So you
should not be attached to things as being possessed of, or
devoid of, intrinsic qualities.
This is the reason why the
Tathagata always teaches this saying: My teaching of the Good
Law is to be likened unto a raft. [Does a man who has safely
crossed a flood upon a raft continue his journey carrying that
raft upon his head?] The Buddha-teaching must be relinquished;
how much more so mis-teaching!
Section VII.
Great Ones, Perfect Beyond Learning, Utter no Words of
Teaching
Subhuti, what do you think? Has the Tathagata
attained the Consummation of Incomparable Enlightenment? Has
the Tathagata a teaching to enunciate?
Subhuti answered:
As I understand Buddha's meaning there is no formulation of
truth called Consummation of Incomparable Enlightenment.
Moreover, the Tathagata has no formulated teaching to
enunciate. Wherefore? Because the Tathagata has said that
truth is uncontainable and inexpressible. It neither is nor is
it not.
Thus it is that this unformulated Principle is the
foundation of the different systems of all the sages.
Section VIII. The Fruits of Meritorious Action
Subhuti, what do you think? If anyone filled three
thousand galaxies of worlds with the seven treasures and gave
all away in gifts of alms, would he gain great merit?
Subhuti said: Great indeed, World-honoured One! Wherefore?
Because merit partakes of the character of no-merit, the
Tathagata characterised the merit as great.
Then Buddha
said: On the other hand, if anyone received and retained even
only four lines of this Discourse and taught and explained
them to others, his merit would be the greater. Wherefore?
Because, Subhuti, from this Discourse issue
forth all the
Buddhas and the Consummation of Incomparable Enlightenment
teachings of all the Buddhas. Subhuti, what is called "the
Religion given by Buddha" is not, in fact Buddha-Religion.
Section IX. Real Designation is Undesignate
Subhuti, what do you think? Does a disciple who has
entered the Stream of the Holy Life say within himself: I
obtain the fruit of a Stream-entrant?
Subhuti said: No,
World-honoured One. Wherefore? Because "Stream-entrant" is
merely a name. There is no stream-entering. The disciple who
pays no regard to form, sound, odour, taste, touch, or any
quality, is called a Stream-entrant.
Subhuti, what do you
think? Does an adept who is subject to only one more rebirth
say within himself: I obtain the fruit of a Once-to-be-reborn?
Subhuti said: No, World-honoured One. Wherefore? Because
"Once-to-be-reborn" is merely a name. There is no passing away
nor coming into existence. [The adept who realises] this is
called "Once-to-be-reborn."
Subhuti, what do you think?
Does a venerable one who will never more be reborn as a mortal
say within himself: I obtain the fruit of a Non-returner?
Subhuti said: No, World-honoured One. Wherefore? Because
"Non-returner" is merely a name. There is no non-returning;
hence the designation "Non-returner."
Subhuti, what do you
think? Does a holy one say within himself: I have obtained
Perfective Enlightenment?
Subhuti said: No, World-honoured
One. Wherefore? Because there is no such condition as that
called "Perfective Enlightenment." World-honoured one, if a
holy one of Perfective Enlightenment said to himself "such am
I," he would necessarily partake of the idea of an ego-entity,
a personality, a being, or a separated individuality.
World-honoured One, when the Buddha declares that I
excel
amongst holy men in the Yoga of perfect quiescence, in
dwelling in seclusion, and in freedom from passions, I do not
say within myself: I am a holy one of Perfective
Enlightenment, free from passions. World-honoured One, if I
said within myself: Such am I; you would not declare: Subhuti
finds happiness
abiding in peace, in seclusion in the
midst of the forest. This is because Subhuti abides nowhere:
therefore he is called, "Subhuti,
Joyful-Abider-in-Peace,
Dweller-in-Seclusion-in-the-Forest."
Section X.
Setting Forth Pure Lands
Buddha said: Subhuti, what do you
think? In the remote past when the Tathagata was with
Dipankara Buddha, did he have any degree of attainment in the
Good Law?
No, World-honoured One. When the Tathagata was
with Dipankara Buddha he had no degree of attainment in the
Good Law.
Subhuti, what do you think? Does a Bodhisattva
set forth any majestic Buddha-lands?
No, World-honoured
One. Wherefore? Because setting forth majestic Buddha-lands is
not a majestic setting forth; this is merely a name.
[Then
Buddha continued:] Therefore, Subhuti, all Bodhisattvas,
lesser and great, should develop a pure, lucid mind, not
depending upon sound, flavour, touch, odour, or any quality. A
Bodhisattva should develop a mind which alights upon no thing
whatsoever; and so should he establish it. Subhuti, this may
be likened to a human frame as large as the mighty Mount
Sumeru. What do you think? Would such a body be great?
Subhuti replied: Great indeed, World-honoured One. This is
because Buddha has explained that no body is called a great
body.
Section XI. The Superiority of Unformulated Truth
Subhuti, if there were as many Ganges rivers as the
sand-grains of the Ganges, would the sand-grains of them all
be many?
Subhuti said: Many indeed, World-honoured One!
Even the Ganges rivers would be innumerable; how much more so
would be their sand-grains?
Subhuti, I will declare a
truth to you. If a good man or good woman filled three
thousand galaxies of worlds with the seven treasures for each
sand-grain in all those Ganges rivers, and gave all away in
gifts of alms, would he gain great merit?
Subhuti
answered: Great indeed, World-honoured One!
Then Buddha
declared: Nevertheless, Subhuti, if a good man or good woman
studies this Discourse only so far as to receive and retain
four lines, and teaches and explains them to others, the
consequent merit would be far greater.
Section
XII. Veneration of the True Doctrine
Furthermore, Subhuti,
you should know that wheresoever this Discourse is proclaimed,
by even so little as four lines, that place should be
venerated by the whole realms of Gods, Men and Titans as
though it were a Buddha-Shrine. How much more is this so in
the case of one who is able to receive and retain the whole
and read and recite it throughout! Subhuti, you should know
that such a one attains the highest and most wonderful truth.
Wheresoever this sacred Discourse may be found there should
you comport yourself as though in the presence of Buddha and
disciples worthy of honour.
Section XIII. How
this Teaching should be Received and Retained
At that time
Subhuti addressed Buddha, saying: World-honoured One, by what
name should this Discourse be known, and how should we receive
and retain it?
Buddha answered: Subhuti, this Discourse
should be known as "The Diamond of the Perfection of
Transcendental Wisdom" - thus should you receive and retain
it.
Subhuti, what is the reason herein?
According to
the Buddha-teaching the Perfection of Transcendental Wisdom is
not really such. "Perfection of Transcendental Wisdom" is just
the name given to it.
Subhuti, what do you think? Has the
Tathagata a teaching to enunciate?
Subhuti replied to the
Buddha: World-honoured One, the Tathagata has nothing to
teach.
Subhuti, what do you think? Would there be many
molecules in [the composition of] three thousand galaxies of
worlds?
Subhuti said: Many indeed, World-honoured One!
Subhuti, the Tathagata declares that all these molecules
are not really such; they are called "molecules."
[Furthermore,] the Tathagata declares that a world is not
really a world; it is called "a world."
Subhuti, what do
you think? May the Tathagata be perceived by the thirty-two
physical peculiarities [of an outstanding sage]?
No,
World-honoured One, the Tathagata may not be perceived by
these thirty-two marks. Wherefore? Because the Tathagata has
explained that the thirty-two marks are not really such; they
are called "the thirty-two marks."
Subhuti, if on the one
hand a good man or a good woman sacrifices as many lives as
the sand-grains of the Ganges, and on the other hand anyone
receives and retains even only four lines of this Discourse,
and teaches and explains them to others, the merit of the
latter will be the greater.
Section XIV.
Perfect Peace Lies in Freedom from Characteristic Distinctions
Upon the occasion of hearing this Discourse Subhuti had an
interior realisation of its meaning and was moved to tears.
Whereupon he addressed the Buddha thus:
It is a most
precious thing, World-honoured One, that you should deliver
this supremely profound Discourse. Never have I heard such an
exposition since of old my eye of wisdom first opened.
World-honoured One, if anyone listens to this Discourse in
faith with a pure, lucid mind, he will thereupon conceive an
idea of Fundamental Reality. We should know that such a one
establishes the most remarkable virtue. World-honoured One,
such an idea of Fundamental Reality is not, in fact, a
distinctive idea; therefore the Tathagata teaches: "Idea of
Fundamental Reality" is merely a name.
World-honoured One,
having listened to this Discourse, I receive and retain it
with faith and understanding. This is not difficult for me,
but in ages to come - in the last five-hundred years, if there
be men coming to hear this Discourse who receive and retain it
with faith and understanding, they will be persons of most
remarkable achievement. Wherefore? Because they will be free
from the idea of an ego-entity, free from the idea of a
personality, free from the idea of a being, and free from the
idea of a separated individuality. And why? Because the
distinguishing of an ego-entity is erroneous. Likewise the
distinguishing of a personality, or a being, or a separated
individuality is erroneous. Consequently those who have left
behind every phenomenal distinction are called Buddhas all.
Buddha said to Subhuti: Just as you say! If anyone listens
to this Discourse and is neither filled with alarm nor awe nor
dread, be it known that such a one is of remarkable
achievement. Wherefore? Because, Subhuti, the Tathagata
teaches that the First Perfection [the Perfection of Charity]
is not, in fact, the First
Perfection: such is merely a
name.
Subhuti, the Tathagata teaches likewise that the
Perfection of Patience is not the Perfection of Patience: such
is merely a name. Why so? It is shown thus, Subhuti: When the
Rajah of Kalinga mutilated my body, I was at that time free
from the idea of an ego-entity, a personality, a being, and a
separated individuality. Wherefore? Because then when my limbs
were cut away piece by piece, had I been bound by the
distinctions aforesaid, feelings of anger and hatred would
have been aroused in me.
Subhuti, I remember that long
ago, sometime during my past five-hundred mortal lives, I was
an ascetic practicing patience. Even then was I free from
those distinctions of separated selfhood. Therefore, Subhuti,
Bodhisattvas should leave behind all phenomenal distinctions
and awaken the thought of the Consummation of Incomparable
Enlightenment by not allowing the mind to depend upon notions
evoked by the sensible world - by not allowing the mind to
depend upon notions evoked by sounds, odours, flavours,
touch-contacts, or any qualities.
The mind should be kept
independent of any thoughts which arise within it. If the mind
depends upon anything it has no sure haven. This is why Buddha
teaches that the mind of a Bodhisattva should not accept the
appearances of things as a basis when exercising charity.
Subhuti, as Bodhisattvas practice charity for the welfare
of all living beings they should do it in this manner. Just as
the Tathagata declares that characteristics are not
characteristics, so He declares that all living beings are
not, in fact, living beings.
Subhuti, the Tathagata is He
who declares that which is true; He who declares that which is
fundamental; He who declares that which is ultimate. He does
not declare that which is deceitful, nor that which is
monstrous. Subhuti, that Truth to which the Tathagata has
attained is neither real nor unreal. Subhuti, if a Bodhisattva
practices charity with mind attached to formal notions he is
like unto a man groping sightless in the gloom; but a
Bodhisattva who practices charity with mind detached from any
formal notions is like unto a man with open eyes in the
radiant glory of the morning, to whom all kinds of objects are
clearly visible.
Subhuti, if there be good men and good
women in future ages, able to receive, read and recite this
Discourse in its entirety, the Tathagata will clearly perceive
and recognise them by means of His Buddha-knowledge; and each
one of them will bring immeasurable and incalculable merit to
fruition.
Section XV. The Incomparable Value of
This Teaching
Subhuti, if on one hand, a good man or a
good woman performs in the morning as many charitable acts of
self-denial as the sand-grains of the Ganges, and performs as
many again in the noonday and as many again in the evening,
and continues so doing throughout numberless ages, and, on the
other hand, anyone listens to this Discourse with heart of
faith and without contention, the latter would be the more
blessed. But how can any comparison be made with one who
writes it down, receives it, retains it, and explains it to
others!
Subhuti, we can summarise the matter by saying
that the full value of this Discourse can neither be conceived
nor estimated, nor can any limit be set to it. The Tathagata
has declared this teaching for the benefit of initiates of the
Great Way; He has declared it for the benefit of initiates of
the Supreme Way.
Whosoever can receive and retain this
teaching, study it, recite it and spread it abroad will be
clearly perceived and recognised by the Tathagata and will
achieve a perfection of merit beyond measurement or
calculation - a perfection of merit unlimited and
inconceivable. In every case such a one will exemplify the
Tathagata-Consummation of the Incomparable Enlightenment.
Wherefore?
Because, Subhuti, those who find consolation in
limited doctrines involving the conception of an ego-entity, a
personality, a being, or a separated individuality are unable
to accept, receive, study, recite and openly explain this
Discourse.
Subhuti, in every place where this Discourse is
to be found the whole realms of Gods, Men and Titans should
offer worship; for you must know that such a place is
sanctified like a shrine, and should properly be venerated by
all with ceremonial obeisance and circumambulation and with
offerings of flowers and incense.
Section XVI. Purgation through Suffering the
Retribution for Past Sins
Furthermore, Subhuti, if it be
that good men and good women who receive and retain this
Discourse are downtrodden, their evil destiny is the
inevitable retributive result of sins committed in their past
mortal lives. By virtue of their present misfortunes the
reacting effects of their past will be thereby worked out, and
they will be in a position to attain the Consummation of
Incomparable Enlightenment.
Subhuti, I remember the
infinitely remote past before Dipankara Buddha. There were
84,000 myriads of multimillions of Buddhas and to all these I
made offerings; yes, all these I served without the least
trace of fault.
Nevertheless, if anyone is able to
receive, retain, study and recite this Discourse at the end of
the last [500-year] period, he will gain such a merit that
mine in the service of all the Buddhas could not be reckoned
as one-hundredth part of it, not even one thousand myriad
multimillionth part of it - indeed, no such comparison is
possible.
Subhuti, if I fully detailed the merit gained by
good men and good women coming to receive, retain, study and
recite this Discourse in the last period, my hearers would be
filled with doubt and might become disordered in mind,
suspicious and unbelieving. You should know, Subhuti, that the
significance of this Discourse is beyond conception; likewise
the fruit of its rewards is beyond conception.
Section XVII. No One Attains Transcendental Wisdom
At
that time Subhuti addressed Buddha, saying: World-honoured
One, if good men and good women seek the Consummation of
Incomparable Enlightenment, by what criteria should they abide
and how should they control their thoughts?
Buddha replied
to Subhuti: Good men and good women seeking the Consummation
of Incomparable Enlightenment must create this resolved
attitude of mind: I must liberate all living beings, yet when
all have been liberated, verily not any one is liberated.
Wherefore? If a Bodhisattva cherishes the idea of an
ego-entity, a
personality, a being, or a separated
individuality, he is consequently not a Bodhisattva, Subhuti.
This is because in reality there is no formula which gives
rise to the Consummation of Incomparable Enlightenment.
Subhuti, what do you think? When the Tathagata was with
Dipankara Buddha was there any formula for the attainment of
the Consummation of Incomparable Enlightenment?
No,
World-honoured One, as I understand Buddha's meaning, there
was no formula by which the Tathagata attained the
Consummation of Incomparable Enlightenment.
Buddha said:
You are right, Subhuti! Verily there was no formula by which
the Tathagata attained the Consummation of Incomparable
Enlightenment. Subhuti, had there been any such formula,
Dipankara Buddha would not have predicted concerning me: "In
the ages of the future you will come to be a Buddha called
Shakyamuni"; but Dipankara Buddha made that prediction
concerning me because there is actually no formula for the
attainment of the Consummation of Incomparable Enlightenment.
The reason herein is that Tathagata is a signification
implying all formulas. In case anyone says that the Tathagata
attained the Consummation of Incomparable Enlightenment, I
tell you truly, Subhuti, that there is no formula by which the
Buddha attained it. Subhuti, the basis of Tathagata's
attainment of the Consummation of Incomparable Enlightenment
is wholly beyond; it is neither real nor unreal. Hence I say
that the whole realm of formulations is not really such,
therefore it is called "Realm of formulations."
Subhuti, a
comparison may be made with [the idea of] a gigantic human
frame.
Then Subhuti said: The World-honoured One has
declared that such is not a great body; "a great body" is just
the name given to it.
Subhuti, it is the same concerning
Bodhisattvas. If a Bodhisattva announces: I will liberate all
living creatures, he is not rightly called a Bodhisattva.
Wherefore? Because, Subhuti, there is really no such
condition as that called Bodhisattvaship, because Buddha
teaches that all things are devoid of selfhood, devoid of
separate individuality. Subhuti, if a Bodhisattva announces: I
will set forth majestic Buddha-lands, one does not call him a
Bodhisattva, because the Tathagata has declared that the
setting forth of majestic Buddha-lands is not really such: "a
majestic setting forth" is just the name given to it.
Subhuti, Bodhisattvas who are wholly devoid of any
conception of separate selfhood are truthfully called
Bodhisattvas.
Section XVIII. All Modes of mind
are Really Only Mind
Subhuti, what do you think? Does the
Tathagata possess the human eye?
Yes, World-honoured One,
He does.
Well, do you think the Tathagata possesses the
divine eye?
Yes, World-honoured One, He does.
And do
you think the Tathagata possesses the gnostic eye?
Yes,
World-honoured One, He does.
And do you think the
Tathagata possesses the eye of transcendent wisdom?
Yes,
World-honoured One, He does.
And do you think the
Tathagata possesses the Buddha-eye of omniscience?
Yes,
World-honoured One, He does.
Subhuti, what do you think?
Concerning the sand-grains of the Ganges, has the Buddha
taught about them?
Yes, World-honoured One, the Tathagata
has taught concerning these grains.
Well, Subhuti, if
there were as many Ganges rivers as the sand-grains of the
Ganges and there was a Buddha-land for each sand-grain in all
those Ganges rivers, would those Buddha-lands be many?
[Subhuti replied]: Many indeed, World-honoured One!
Then Buddha said: Subhuti, however many living beings
there are in all those Buddha-lands, though they have manifold
modes of mind, the Tathagata understands them all. Wherefore?
Because the Tathagata teaches that all these are not Mind;
they are merely called "mind". Subhuti, it is impossible to
retain past mind, impossible to hold on to present mind, and
impossible to grasp future mind.
Section XIX.
Absolute Reality is the Only Foundation
Subhuti, what do
you think? If anyone filled three thousand galaxies of worlds
with the seven treasures and gave all away in gifts of alms,
would he gain great merit?
Yes, indeed, World-honoured
One, he would gain great merit!
Subhuti, if such merit was
Real, the Tathagata would not have declared it to be great,
but because it is without a foundation the Tathagata
characterised it as "great."
Section XX. The
Unreality of Phenomenal Distinctions
Subhuti, what do you
think? Can the Buddha be perceived by His perfectly-formed
body?
No, World-honoured One, the Tathagata cannot be
perceived by His perfectly-formed body, because the Tathagata
teaches that a perfectly-formed body is not really such; it is
merely called "a perfectly-formed body."
Subhuti, what do
you think? Can the Tathagata be perceived by means of any
phenomenal characteristic?
No, World-honoured One, the
Tathagata may not be perceived by any phenomenal
characteristic, because the Tathagata teaches that phenomenal
characteristics are not really such; they are merely termed
"phenomenal characteristics."
Section XXI. Words cannot express Truth.
That which
Words Express is not Truth Subhuti, do not say that the
Tathagata conceives the idea: I must set forth a Teaching. For
if anyone says that the Tathagata sets forth a Teaching he
really slanders Buddha and is unable to explain what I teach.
As to any Truth-declaring system, Truth is undeclarable; so
"an enunciation of Truth" is just the name given to it.
Thereupon, Subhuti spoke these words to Buddha:
World-honoured One, in the ages of the future will there be
men coming to hear a declaration of this Teaching who will be
inspired with belief?
And Buddha answered: Subhuti, those
to whom you refer are neither living beings nor not-living
beings. Wherefore? Because "living beings," Subhuti, these
"living beings" are not really such; they are just called by
that name.
Section XXII. It Cannot be Said that
Anything is Attainable
Then Subhuti asked Buddha:
World-honoured One, in the attainment of the Consummation of
Incomparable Enlightenment did Buddha make no acquisition
whatsoever?
Buddha replied: Just so, Subhuti. Through the
Consummation of Incomparable Enlightenment I acquired not even
the least thing; therefore it is called "Consummation of
Incomparable Enlightenment."
Section XXIII. The
Practice of Good Works Purifies the Mind
Furthermore,
Subhuti, This is altogether everywhere, without
differentiation or degree; therefore it is called
"Consummation of Incomparable Enlightenment." It is straightly
attained by freedom from separate personal selfhood and by
cultivating all kinds of goodness.
Subhuti, though we
speak of "goodness", the Tathagata declares that there is no
goodness; such is merely a name.
Section XXIV.
The Incomparable Merit of This Teaching
Subhuti, if there
be one who gives away in gifts of alms a mass of the seven
treasures equal in extent to as many mighty Mount Sumerus as
there would be in three thousand galaxies of worlds, and if
there be another who selects even only four lines from this
Discourse upon the Perfection of Transcendental Wisdom,
receives and retains them, and clearly expounds them to
others, the merit of the latter will be so far greater than
that of the former that no conceivable comparison can be made
between them.
Section XXV. The Illusion of Ego
Subhuti, what do you think? Let no one say the Tathagata
cherishes the idea: I must liberate all living beings. Allow
no such thought, Subhuti.
Wherefore? Because in reality
there are no living beings to be liberated by the Tathagata.
If there were living beings for the Tathagata to liberate, He
would partake in the idea of selfhood, personality entity, and
separate individuality.
Subhuti, though the common people
accept egoity as real, the Tathagata declares that ego is not
different from non-ego. Subhuti, those whom the Tathagata
referred to as "common people" are not really common people;
such is merely a name.
Section XXVI. The Body of Truth has no Marks
Subhuti, what do you think? May the Tathagata be perceived
by the thirty-two marks [of a great man]?
Subhuti
answered: No, the Tathagata may not be perceived thereby.
Then Buddha said: Subhuti, if the Tathagata may be
perceived by such marks, any great imperial ruler is the same
as the Tathagata.
Subhuti then said to Buddha:
World-honoured One, as I understand the meaning of Buddha's
words, the Tathagata may not be perceived by the thirty-two
marks.
Whereupon the World-honoured One uttered this
verse:
Who sees Me by form,
Who seeks Me in
sound,
Perverted are his footsteps upon the Way,
For he
cannot perceive the Tathagata.
Section XXVII. It
is Erroneous to Affirm that All Things are Ever Extinguished
Subhuti, if you should conceive the idea that the
Tathagata attained the Consummation of Incomparable
Enlightenment by reason of His perfect form, do not
countenance such thoughts. The Tathagata's attainment was not
by reason of His perfect form. [On the other hand] Subhuti, if
you should conceive the idea that anyone in whom dawns the
Consummation of Incomparable Enlightenment declares that all
manifest standards are ended and extinguished, do not
countenance such thoughts.
Wherefore? Because the man in
whom the Consummation of Incomparable Enlightenment dawns does
not affirm concerning any formula that it is finally
extinguished.
Section XXVIII. Attachment to
Rewards of Merit
Subhuti, if one Bodhisattva bestows in
charity sufficient of the seven treasures to fill as many
worlds as there are sand-grains in the river Ganges, and
another, realising that all things are egoless, attains
perfection through patient forbearance, the merit of the
latter will far exceed that of the former.
Why is this,
Subhuti? It is because all Bodhisattvas are insentient as to
the rewards of merit.
Then Subhuti said to Buddha: What is
this saying, World-honoured One, that Bodhisattvas are
insentient as to rewards of merit?
[And Buddha answered]:
Subhuti, Bodhisattvas who achieve merit should not be fettered
with desire for rewards. Thus it is said that the rewards of
merit are not received.
Section XXIX. Perfect
Tranquility
Subhuti, if anyone should say that the
Tathagata comes or goes or sits or reclines, he fails to
understand my teaching. Why? Because Tathagata has neither
whence nor whither, therefore is He called "Tathagata".
Section XXX. The Integral Principle
Subhuti, if a good man or a good woman ground an infinite
number of galaxies of worlds to dust, would the resulting
minute particles be many?
Subhuti replied: Many indeed,
World-honoured One! Wherefore? Because if such were really
minute particles Buddha would not have spoken of them as
minute particles. For as to this, Buddha has declared that
they are not really such. "Minute particles" is just the name
given to them. Also, World-honoured One, when the Tathagata
speaks of galaxies of worlds, these are not worlds; for if
reality could be predicated of a world it would be a
self-existent cosmos and the Tathagata teaches that there is
really no such thing. "Cosmos" is merely a figure of speech.
[Then Buddha said]: Subhuti, words cannot explain the real
nature of a cosmos. Only common people fettered with desire
make use of this arbitrary method.
Section
XXXI. Conventional Truth Should be Cut Off
Subhuti, if
anyone should say that Buddha declares any conception of
egoity do you consider he would understand my teaching
correctly?
No, World-honoured One, such a man would not
have any sound understanding of the Tathagata's teaching,
because the World-honoured One declares that notions of
selfhood, personality, entity and separate individuality, as
really existing, are erroneous - these terms are merely
figures of speech.
[Thereupon Buddha said]: Subhuti, those
who aspire to the Consummation of Incomparable Enlightenment
should recognise and understand all varieties of things in the
same way and cut off the arising of [views which are mere]
aspects. Subhuti, as regards aspects, the Tathagata declares
that in reality they are not such. They are called "aspects".
Section XXXII. The Delusion of Appearances
Subhuti, someone might fill innumerable worlds with the
seven treasures and give all away in gifts of alms, but if any
good man or any good woman awakens the thought of
Enlightenment and takes even only four lines from this
Discourse, reciting, using, receiving, retaining and spreading
them abroad and explaining them for the benefit of others, it
will be far more meritorious. Now in what manner may he
explain them to others? By detachment from appearances -
abiding in Real Truth. - So I tell you - Thus shall ye think
of all this fleeting world:
A star at dawn, a bubble in a stream;
A flash of
lightning in a summer cloud,
A flickering lamp, a phantom,
and a dream.
When the Buddha finished this
Discourse the venerable Subhuti, together with the bhikshus,
bhikshunis, lay-brothers and sisters, and the whole realms of
Gods, Men and Titans, were filled with joy by His teaching,
and, taking it sincerely to heart they went their ways.